Here’s why we’re providing less information about candidates than we have in past years

ByErma F. Brown

May 31, 2022 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Today, the Greenville News and Anderson Unbiased Mail are publishing our election preview coverage.

Our coverage currently will give you an opportunity to see who is managing for point out and area places of work in the future June 14 principal election, and some of the expertise those people candidates have. We’ll also url you to their web sites, if they have them, exactly where you can master much more about them in their possess terms.

We also ran criminal background checks on most of the candidates, and indicate in our capsules if there are any prison convictions you want to know about.

We contemplate this just one of the most critical expert services we can supply a group. The choices made on June 14 and all over again this fall in the normal election will have much-ranging implications for South Carolina and its communities.

Usually, we’ve also questioned the candidates to explain to you a little bit about themselves and why they are jogging for place of work. We did that yet again this year, but we’ve produced a decision not to publish that facts for a couple of motives.

To start with, the response level to the questions was lower. We felt it did not provide voters to supply expanded data on some candidates and not on others, even if not answering was that candidate’s selection.

Second, some of the details we gained demanded intense fact-examining that we basically did not have the means to full. We also located some details to be thinly veiled attacks on opponents that additional minor material to the political discourse and would have demanded a back again-and-forth with both candidates to verify and vet.

One of the most beneficial applications the media can serve in an election year is vetting the information we obtain or, at the really the very least, not simply just repeating information and facts that is wrong, deceptive or unchecked. Even though some candidates took this procedure incredibly significantly, other people did not choose the time to elaborate on positions or supply a foundation for their statements.

Since we take our obligation to vet candidates critically, we made the decision that it would be irresponsible to just reprint what they instructed us. In the conclude, we made the decision the best course for this election was to give you the record of candidates and the resources to do some of your own exploration.

We’ve now begun pondering about how we can technique this in different ways for the common election this slide. We believe we have a superior system in area that will let us to vigorously go after the candidate who are functioning and rigorously vet the claims they make about problems and their opponents.

We will begin that method immediately soon after the primaries are over and the candidates for each and every occasion are picked.

Steve Bruss is the government editor of The Greenville News and the Anderson Unbiased Mail. He is currently looking through “The Lincoln Highway,” by Amor Towles and “Every Great Endeavor,” by Timothy Keller. His electronic mail address is [email protected]

This write-up originally appeared on Greenville News: Greenville and Anderson election coverage 2022 candidates bios

Source hyperlink